Strike Out Photo License मुफ़्त में

Is your photographer trying to rip you off today we talk about licensing All right, so you've commissioned this shoot, and now your photographer wants to wants more money What's the deal? Are they trying to rip you off? Recently I photographed a home for an interior designer and the art. They used came from a gallery and that gallery Contacted me and they wanted to use the photos for the marketing, but when I asked for stock usage fee. They sort of freaked out They said you know we work with over 200 designers and our you are the only photographer who has ever asked us for to buy photos and since you are already paid by the designer to produce the photos I'm curious as to why you would not want the additional marketing for your work to our broad client list of art buyers and designers sounds great a good question You know if the interior designer already paid for the images. Why would I why? Wouldn't I want free marketing? Why would I ask to be paid again? So here's my response right I? said It's interesting to hear that other photographers are not licensing their work and like artists most photographers are not legally or business savvy and They don't know really their own Worth and a photography is like any other creative intellectual property and subject to the same contract protections And if I were to write a book and get it published once then someone wants to publish it again That writer would charge you no additional licensing But are--for reprints if a musician writes a song and they sell one how them then a car commercial wants to use it the musician with in charge additional licensing and the same with software companies They produce a program just to license out copies They never sell their IP unless it's for a ton of money in digital photography is the same I Get paid for a commission and the client wall at some point though They will get initial usage, but any additional copies Will be licensed out for use So why so what why is this? Why don't I just charge one fee, and then do the work and then everybody can use it for free? Number one, it's not it's not fair to the person who paid for the licensing for the Commission shoot number two if my client doesn't want anyone else to use the photos they will they will pay a buyout fee and that buyout fee is enough to make up for any potential loss of income from additional licensing, so So in in essence, I'm saving my clients money. I'm a amortizing the cost of that photo shoot out a little bit so But, but why wouldn't I want to let you use the work? Isn't isn't in free marketing for you. They said you know well it depends this is the benefit the same to you as it is for me if you're a business and Wanting to use my work to market your business Perhaps it's not a direct return on investment, but having high quality photography on your site builds trust with your clients And they feel more comfortable buying from you, right So there's a value there right? I'm providing value to your...