A
·
B
·
C
·
D
·
E
·
F
·
G
·
H
·
I
·
J
·
K
·
L
·
M
·
N
·
O
·
P
·
Q
·
R
·
S
·
T
·
U
·
V
·
W
·
X
·
Y
·
Z
·
OTHER
·

Directory Results for State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Brett David Borg, Respondent. A09-1921, Supreme Court, July 31, 2013.. An order amending the restitution portion of a sentence constitutes a sentence imposed within the meaning of Minn. R. Crim. P. 28.04, to State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Christopher Michael Prigge, Respondent. A17-0403, Supreme Court, February 14, 2018.. 1. A person under the influence of alcohol who is driving a vehicle with a pistol within arms reach is carrying a pistol

State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Brett David Borg, Respondent. A09-1921, Supreme Court, July 31, 2013.. An order amending the restitution portion of a sentence constitutes a sentence imposed within the meaning of Minn. R. Crim. P. 28.04,
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Brian William Meger, Respondent. A15-1823, Supreme Court, September 20, 2017.. State v. Her, 862 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. 2015), announced a new rule of constitutional criminal procedure that does not apply to
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Carl Lee Nodes, ...
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Christopher Michael Prigge, Respondent. A17-0403, Supreme Court, February 14, 2018.. 1. A person under the influence of alcohol who is driving a vehicle with a pistol within arms reach is carrying a pistol