A
·
B
·
C
·
D
·
E
·
F
·
G
·
H
·
I
·
J
·
K
·
L
·
M
·
N
·
O
·
P
·
Q
·
R
·
S
·
T
·
U
·
V
·
W
·
X
·
Y
·
Z
·
OTHER
·

Directory Results for State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. R. H. B., Respondent. A11-660, Court of Appeals Published, December 5, 2011.. Because Minn. Stat. 609A.03, subd. 2(4) (2010), requires a petitioner to state why expungement should be granted and Minn. - mn to State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Stacie Ann Miller, Respondent. A13-1689, Court of Appeals Published, June 30, 2014.. 1. A district court may not sua sponte vacate a defendant s guilty plea without substantial and compelling reasons or -

State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. R. H. B., Respondent. A11-660, Court of Appeals Published, December 5, 2011.. Because Minn. Stat. 609A.03, subd. 2(4) (2010), requires a petitioner to state why expungement should be granted and Minn. - mn
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Ryan Mark Thompson, Respondent. A15-76, Supreme Court, October 12, 2016.. Under Birchfield v. North Dakota, U.S. , 136 S. Ct. 2160 (2016), the Fourth Amendment does not allow the State to prosecute - mn
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Sara Ruth Peck, Respondent. A08 ...
State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Stacie Ann Miller, Respondent. A13-1689, Court of Appeals Published, June 30, 2014.. 1. A district court may not sua sponte vacate a defendant s guilty plea without substantial and compelling reasons or -