Get the free National Register Nomination Submission Checklists

National Register Nomination Submission Form: A Comprehensive How-to Guide

Understanding the National Register Nomination Process

The National Register of Historic Places serves as the official list of the nation’s historic places worthy of preservation. Established under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Register aims to enhance the ability of properties to be preserved in their historical contexts. This program not only highlights the nation’s cultural heritage but also aids in protecting significant buildings, sites, structures, and objects of historic or archaeological significance.

The importance of securing a place on the National Register cannot be overstated. Being listed enhances a property's prestige, provides eligibility for federal and state tax advantages, and helps preserve communities' cultural and historical identities. Furthermore, it fosters local awareness and investment in historical preservation efforts, creating a collective respect for shared heritage.

Navigating the nomination process involves several key steps and an understanding of specific timelines. The initial phase consists of compiling documentation and completing the submission form, which is then reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) before being forwarded to the National Park Service.

The SHPO plays a critical role in this process; they assist with the nomination submissions and provide guidance throughout the pre-submission phase. Efficient collaboration with the SHPO can greatly enhance the chances of successful nominations.

Preparing your nomination

Understanding your role in the nomination process is essential, whether you are an individual applying independently or representing an organization. Each has specific responsibilities. As an individual, you may need to conduct extensive research and gather documentation on your own. Conversely, organizations often have access to resources and collaborative efforts that streamline this process.

Gathering essential documentation is crucial for a robust nomination. This typically includes a well-researched historical context, detailed architectural descriptions, and relevant photographic evidence that supports your claims of significance. Each piece of documentation should work harmoniously to build a comprehensive understanding of the property's historical and architectural importance.

Equally important is the boundary description of the property. Accurately determining the property's boundaries involves deconstructing its historical significance and associating it with a specific geographical area. Utilizing maps and surveys can help provide a clear visual representation of the property, which is vital for the nomination process.

Components of the submission form

Completing the National Register nomination submission form requires a detailed understanding of its sections. The primary elements include the property description, a statement of significance, areas of significance, and discussions of integrity and changes over time. Each section should contribute to articulating why the property is worthy of preservation.

Evaluation criteria are crucial for determining a property's eligibility. The criteria are categorized as follows:

Effectively addressing these components within the nomination increases the chances of a successful review and ultimately being listed on the National Register.

Filling out the national register nomination submission form

Completing the National Register nomination form can be straightforward if approached methodically. Accessing the form via platforms like pdfFiller facilitates a smoother process by offering interactive features. These allow for editing, commenting, and even collaborative efforts with individuals working on the nomination.

It is vital to be aware of common pitfalls during form completion. Ambiguities in statements could lead to confusion. Ensure clarity in your narratives, and avoid leaving sections incomplete, as this may raise red flags during the review. Additionally, ensure that boundary descriptions are accurate and compliant with guidelines.

When writing the narrative sections such as the statement of significance, aim for engaging storytelling while remaining factual. Such balance between technical detail and accessibility will help reviewers connect with your narrative.

Reviewing and submitting your nomination

No nomination should be submitted without thorough peer review. Gathering feedback from experts or colleagues can reveal areas needing improvement or revision. Once satisfied with the content, the nomination must go through SHPO review, where additional insights may be gathered before the final submission.

Final submission steps involve ensuring all format requirements are met, which can include specific page layouts, document structure, and ensuring all appendices are included. Note submission deadlines as they often vary by state or year.

Post-submission: what to expect next?

After submission, the National Park Service (NPS) undertakes an in-depth review process, which can vary in length depending on the volume of nominations and the specifics of your submission. Typically, this review involves various evaluations at different stages.

Possible outcomes include acceptance, additional requests for information, or outright rejection. Understanding these stages can help you remain prepared throughout the review period.

If the NPS requests changes or further details, knowing how to effectively respond can make or break your nomination. Familiarize yourself with resubmission guidelines to facilitate a seamless transition.

FAQs about the national register nomination submission form

Navigating the intricacies of the nomination process raises many questions. For instance, understanding eligibility criteria is vital before submitting; not all properties qualify. Additionally, properties can be nominated in groups, which could streamline the process for neighborhoods or districts.

Specific scenarios, such as properties that have been previously listed or delisted, require unique considerations. Knowing how to handle these nuances can better position your nomination for success.

Resources for nominators

Utilizing effective document management tools like pdfFiller can significantly enhance the nomination process. Its interactive features provide access to essential tools for editing and collaborating on the submission. Automation in document management reduces stress and ensures that all documentation is in the correct format.

Further, linking to official resources from the SHPO ensures compliance with state-specific requirements. Keeping contact information for SHPO offices readily available can ensure quick resolutions to any issues during the nomination process.

Success stories and case studies

Highlighting successful nominations can provide valuable insight and inspiration for aspiring nominators. Notable listings offer powerful stories of community involvement, saving historic landmarks, and the positive impacts that designation brings—both economically and socially.

Learning from the examples of these successful cases can shed light on effective strategies and common obstacles faced during the nomination process, giving future nominators a clearer path towards achieving their own historic recognition.