Form preview

Get the free Efficiency vs. Effectiveness in Terabyte-Scale Information Retrieval - trec nist

Get Form
Efficiency vs. Effectiveness in Terabyte-Scale Information Retrieval Stefan B etcher and Charles L. A. Clarke u School of Computer Science University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada stretch, Clark PLG.Waterloo.ca
We are not affiliated with any brand or entity on this form

Get, Create, Make and Sign

Edit
Edit your efficiency vs effectiveness in form online
Type text, complete fillable fields, insert images, highlight or blackout data for discretion, add comments, and more.
Add
Add your legally-binding signature
Draw or type your signature, upload a signature image, or capture it with your digital camera.
Share
Share your form instantly
Email, fax, or share your efficiency vs effectiveness in form via URL. You can also download, print, or export forms to your preferred cloud storage service.

How to edit efficiency vs effectiveness in online

9.5
Ease of Setup
pdfFiller User Ratings on G2
9.0
Ease of Use
pdfFiller User Ratings on G2
Follow the steps down below to benefit from the PDF editor's expertise:
1
Log in. Click Start Free Trial and create a profile if necessary.
2
Upload a file. Select Add New on your Dashboard and upload a file from your device or import it from the cloud, online, or internal mail. Then click Edit.
3
Edit efficiency vs effectiveness in. Add and replace text, insert new objects, rearrange pages, add watermarks and page numbers, and more. Click Done when you are finished editing and go to the Documents tab to merge, split, lock or unlock the file.
4
Save your file. Select it in the list of your records. Then, move the cursor to the right toolbar and choose one of the available exporting methods: save it in multiple formats, download it as a PDF, send it by email, or store it in the cloud.
It's easier to work with documents with pdfFiller than you could have ever thought. Sign up for a free account to view.
Our results demonstrate that indexing does provide the highest effectiveness relative to efficiency within most datasets, but that the advantage is not linear; this is because more efficient indexing often produces lower efficiency in the retrieval task. These results suggest that, if an efficient indexing technique is available, efficient indexing should likely be a good baseline. We provide an experimental evidence base supporting the claim. Author Summary The power of search engines is at stake in every aspect of life, especially in the 21st century economy. In addition to our search engines, we have countless digital technologies (online shopping, banking, e-commerce, etc.) that rely on large-scale processing algorithms to index and retrieve information from disparate sources. One challenge for both large and small indexing is in reducing the amount of work necessary to retrieve a sufficient amount of relevant data. In this paper, we describe an efficient indexing scheme, called Clark PLG. Waterloo, which is suited to perform tasks in terabyte-scale databases with the minimal amount of redundant information. We demonstrate that Clark PLG. Waterloo is significantly more effective than other indexing techniques. Using Clark PLG. Waterloo, we demonstrate that indexing is not a cost-efficient strategy and can generate a significant amount of inefficient cost to retrieve a sufficient amount of information. We further discuss the implications this implies for information retrieval, and the implications for companies that build complex data-indexing algorithms. This study shows how efficient indexing can be built, and points the way towards a better understanding of the role of indexing in the search space today and in the future. Author Summary In the search space for information, there are many challenges and opportunities. One strategy for finding relevant information is to compare the amount of available resources in the search space. However, this comparison may not be possible within terabyte data sets. This paper demonstrates that efficient algorithm is an important factor in the search space for such collections. In a typical search, we may have as many as an order of terabytes, but a lot of data has to be analyzed and retrieved. Thus, in any search for an answer, both search time and resource use are significant. A recent survey found that in order to make a search efficient and effective, more than a terabyte of material was needed from a single index. In this paper, we analyze the effectiveness of several indexing techniques, including Okapi-BM25 and the Bamboo algorithm, for solving such search problems.

Fill form : Try Risk Free

Rate free

4.0
Satisfied
40 Votes

For pdfFiller’s FAQs

Below is a list of the most common customer questions. If you can’t find an answer to your question, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.

Efficiency vs effectiveness refers to the comparison or evaluation of how well something is done (efficiency) versus how well it achieves its intended goals or outcomes (effectiveness).
The requirement to file efficiency vs effectiveness is typically specific to certain industries or organizations. It is necessary for those entities that want to assess and improve their processes, strategies, or performance in order to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
Filling out the efficiency vs effectiveness evaluation can involve gathering data or measurements related to productivity, resource utilization, goal attainment, and other relevant metrics. This information is then compared and analyzed to determine the level of efficiency and effectiveness.
The purpose of efficiency vs effectiveness analysis is to identify areas for improvement and optimize performance. By assessing the balance between efficiency (doing things right) and effectiveness (doing the right things), organizations can enhance their operations, achieve desired outcomes, and drive success.
The specific information that must be reported on efficiency vs effectiveness evaluation can vary depending on the context and goals. It may include data on resource allocation, time management, process efficiencies, goal achievement, customer satisfaction, and other relevant performance indicators.
The deadline to file efficiency vs effectiveness in 2023 would depend on the specific requirements and timelines set by the relevant industry or organization. It is recommended to consult the relevant guidelines or authorities for the exact deadline.
The penalty for late filing of efficiency vs effectiveness evaluation can vary depending on the regulations or policies in place. It may result in fines, penalties, reputational damage, or other consequences imposed by the governing bodies or stakeholders.
People who need to keep track of documents and fill out forms quickly can connect PDF Filler to their Google Docs account. This means that they can make, edit, and sign documents right from their Google Drive. Make your efficiency vs effectiveness in into a fillable form that you can manage and sign from any internet-connected device with this add-on.
When you're ready to share your efficiency vs effectiveness in, you can swiftly email it to others and receive the eSigned document back. You may send your PDF through email, fax, text message, or USPS mail, or you can notarize it online. All of this may be done without ever leaving your account.
pdfFiller has made it easy to fill out and sign efficiency vs effectiveness in. You can use the solution to change and move PDF content, add fields that can be filled in, and sign the document electronically. Start a free trial of pdfFiller, the best tool for editing and filling in documents.

Fill out your efficiency vs effectiveness in online with pdfFiller!

pdfFiller is an end-to-end solution for managing, creating, and editing documents and forms in the cloud. Save time and hassle by preparing your tax forms online.

Get started now
Form preview

Related Forms